🎧 Listen to This Article
Minnesota is on the verge of a significant shift in its tax landscape. Under the leadership of Governor Tim Walz, state lawmakers are contemplating a move that could dramatically alter how professional services are taxed in the state. The proposed legislation, including House Bill 2437 and Senate Bill 2374, seeks to lower the state’s sales tax rate and expand its base to include services such as accounting, legal, banking, and brokerage services provided to individuals. If passed, the law would be effective starting October 1, 2025, making Minnesota one of the few states to impose a sales tax on professional services. This move could ripple across businesses and households alike.
Minnesota Budget 2026-27: Sales Tax Cuts and Fiscal Prudence Ahead
The Governor’s Proposal: A Tax Cut with a Catch
The heart of Governor Walz’s proposal is a modest reduction in the state’s sales tax rate from 6.875% to 6.8%. This marks the first time in state history that Minnesota would reduce its sales tax rate. On its surface, the rate cut appears to be a tax relief measure for consumers, especially given the widespread concerns about rising costs across the state.
However, this reduction comes with a significant caveat: the state would offset the loss in revenue from the lower tax rate by expanding the sales tax base to encompass professional services. Services typically exempt from sales tax, such as those provided by law firms, accounting firms, banks, and brokerage houses, would now be subject to the same tax treatment as tangible goods.
This move mirrors the sales tax structures in a few other states, including Hawaii, New Mexico, and South Dakota, where certain professional services are already taxed. The potential outcome of this change would be a new tax burden on individuals and small businesses that rely on these services; services that have traditionally been free from state sales taxes.
Who Will Be Affected?
Individuals and businesses that rely on professional services will feel the most immediate and noticeable impact. For instance, consumers who seek tax preparation or legal advice would now be subject to paying sales tax on top of the cost of those services. At firms like CLA, this could raise the effective cost of services, such as tax and wealth advisory, by as much as 9.8% when considering local sales tax rates.
While this shift may seem manageable for some, it could be an added financial burden for many individuals, especially low- and middle-income earners. The proposed legislation does carve out some exceptions, such as exempting tax preparation services for individuals receiving certain credits, like the Minnesota child tax credit or the Minnesota working family credit. However, even these exceptions will add a layer of complexity to the administrative process.
For professional services providers, the landscape becomes even more complicated. Many of these businesses have never had to collect sales tax, and implementing such a system could entail significant administrative hurdles. These firms need to update their billing systems and hire or train staff to ensure compliance. Additionally, distinguishing between services provided to individuals (which would be taxable) versus those provided to businesses (which would remain non-taxable) could prove challenging.
Navigating Compliance Challenges
Professional services providers would need to adjust their internal processes to collect and remit sales tax and face the daunting task of tracking the sourcing of services to ensure compliance. The legislation clarifies that services sourced to Minnesota would be taxable, while those provided to clients in other states would not. This distinction could lead to significant administrative challenges as businesses attempt to track where services are provided and to whom.
The complexity doesn’t stop there. For businesses with clients across state lines, the issue of how to apply the sales tax in a way that accounts for state-specific rules could further complicate matters. Some firms may need to invest in new software solutions or rely on third-party consultants to handle the intricacies of sales tax compliance.
Potential Wider Impact
Beyond the immediate impact on professional services firms, this legislation could spark a broader conversation on tax reform in Minnesota. Taxpayers and lawmakers have already opposed these proposed changes, particularly those who believe broadening the sales tax base will unfairly burden individuals and small businesses. Some critics argue that the state should focus on broader reforms, such as reducing the business-to-business (B2B) gross receipts tax, which has also been proposed in separate legislation.
There is also the question of whether other states will follow Minnesota’s lead. If successful, this initiative could set a precedent for other states to follow, especially given the growing trend of revenue shortfalls and budget deficits faced by many state governments across the U.S. Some states may begin to explore similar measures. In contrast, others may resist the expansion of sales taxes to services.
What’s Next for Minnesota?
For businesses in Minnesota, particularly those in the professional services sector, the time to act is now. If these proposals become law, companies must adjust their internal procedures to ensure compliance, from system updates to staff training. Firms should also start conversing with their clients about the potential impact of the sales tax changes, as many individuals may be unaware of how these changes will affect their service costs.
Moreover, businesses should consider the potential for a broader tax shift. While the proposed sales tax rate cut is seen as a benefit by many, it is essential to consider the broader implications for business operations and long-term strategy. Is this a temporary fix for the state’s budget challenges, or is it the beginning of a new era of sales tax expansion across the board?
The evolving landscape of Minnesota’s tax system is one that businesses and tax professionals must watch closely. The state’s residents and service providers face uncertainty, with numerous variables still in play. The proposal has sparked significant debate, and whether it will gain traction in the legislature remains to be seen. However, one thing is clear: businesses and taxpayers should prepare for the possibility of a new and more complex tax environment beginning in October 2025.
For further details, clarification, contributions, or any concerns regarding this article, please get in touch with us at editorial@tax.news. We value your feedback and are committed to providing accurate and timely information. Please note that our privacy policy will handle all inquiries.
