🎧 Listen to This Article
A new tax proposal from Republican lawmakers promises to increase the US child tax credit (CTC) from $2,000 to $2,500 per child, touting it as a boost for working families. However, a closer examination by tax policy experts reveals a stark caveat: more than 20 million children, primarily from low-income households, stand to gain nothing from the expansion.
A Tax Credit in Name, Not in Impact
While the headline number signals support for families, analysts at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) and the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP) argue that the CTC’s structure remains regressive. Their primary critique is that the credit is not fully refundable, which means the poorest households, who owe little or no federal income tax, cannot access the full amount.
“The children who most need support, the ones in families earning below the poverty line, are precisely the ones left out,” said Kris Cox, CBPP’s director of federal tax policy. “This is not just a design flaw. It’s a choice.”
Who Gains, Who Loses?
- Families earning over $48,000/year will qualify for the full expanded credit.
- Families earning $24,000/year or less with two children could receive nothing more than they currently do, a maximum of $1,700 per child.
- A married couple with $400,000 in income, the highest threshold for CTC eligibility, stands to gain an additional $1,000 in tax relief under the new bill.
According to CBPP, 17 million children already receive less than the full credit, and the new legislation does not adjust the “refundability cap,” the ceiling that determines how much a family can receive if their tax liability is zero or minimal. That cap currently stands at $1,700 per child.
A Decade-Long Pattern of Exclusion
Since the 2017 tax overhaul under President Trump, access to the CTC has narrowed. Previously, any parent filing taxes could claim the credit, regardless of immigration status. Post-2017, at least one parent must hold a valid Social Security number, disqualifying an estimated 4.5 million children, many of whom are U.S. citizens with undocumented parents.
That exclusion remains in the new proposal, reinforcing what critics describe as a structural marginalization of immigrant families and gig-economy workers, including tipped employees and home health aides.
“If you work full time and still don’t earn enough to benefit from a tax credit designed to support children, the system is failing,” said Joe Hughes, senior analyst at ITEP.
A Global Context: US Lags Behind
In international terms, the United States continues to underperform in terms of family-oriented fiscal policy. According to the OECD, the US ranks near the bottom among advanced economies for direct child benefits as a share of GDP.
Country | Child Benefits as % of GDP | Universal Credit? |
---|---|---|
France | 1.9% | Yes |
Germany | 1.5% | Yes |
United Kingdom | 1.1% | Partially |
United States | 0.6% | No |
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the US temporarily expanded the CTC in 2021 through the American Rescue Plan Act, delivering monthly payments to 35 million families and cutting child poverty nearly in half. That version of the CTC was fully refundable, offering a glimpse into the policy’s potential. However, it expired at the end of that year.
Policy Defenders: “They Don’t Pay Taxes”
Defenders of the current bill argue that low-income households already have low or negative tax burdens and should not receive additional benefits. Kush Desai, a White House spokesperson, defended the bill, stating:
“The 2017 reforms reduced wealth inequality, and this new legislation builds on that by eliminating taxes on tips and overtime while fueling American manufacturing.”
But such claims are contested. Economists like Heather Boushey, a former White House Council of Economic Advisers member, argue that tax credits should not be limited to offsetting tax liabilities but structured as income supports, particularly for families raising children on sub-poverty wages.
What Happens Next?
The bill has passed the House and now faces an uncertain path in the Senate, where centrist Democrats and fiscal hawks may challenge its scope and priorities. Additionally, bond market sensitivities to rising deficits could influence its final design.
If passed as-is, the legislation would represent a significant shift in the philosophy of child welfare in the U.S., prioritizing tax relief for the middle and upper-middle class over direct support for families living paycheck to paycheck.
Bottom Line
The child tax credit was initially designed to lift families out of poverty. In its current iteration, it risks becoming another tax break for the already well-off, leaving millions of America’s poorest children on the sidelines.
For further details, clarification, contributions, or any concerns regarding this article, please get in touch with us at editorial@tax.news. We value your feedback and are committed to providing accurate and timely information. Please note that our privacy policy will handle all inquiries.